
Compassionate Legal Representation
Oregon Wrongful Death Attorney
Todd Huegli, an Oregon wrongful death attorney with 17+ years of trial experience, holds negligent parties accountable when families suffer the unthinkable loss of a loved one.
Last reviewed: May 2026
Why Choose Huegli Law
Losing a loved one due to someone else's negligence is devastating. At Huegli Law, we are committed to pursuing justice on behalf of grieving families throughout Oregon.
Compassionate Representation
We understand the emotional toll of losing a loved one and provide sensitive, caring support throughout the legal process.
Experienced Advocacy
Decades of trial experience handling complex wrongful death and catastrophic injury cases across Oregon.
Personalized Attention
Every case receives individualized strategy and direct communication with your attorney at every stage.
Proven Results
A strong track record of successful wrongful death verdicts and settlements for Oregon families.

Common Causes of Wrongful Death
Under ORS 30.020, wrongful death claims arise when a person dies due to the negligence or intentional act of another party. The filing deadline runs three years from when the injury causing the death was discovered or reasonably should have been discovered, and in no case later than the earliest of three years after the death or the longest applicable statute of ultimate repose. Common causes include:
- Motor Vehicle Accidents
- Medical Malpractice
- Workplace Accidents
- Defective Products
- Nursing Home Neglect
Oregon Wrongful Death Law, Explained
The Oregon statutes and appellate decisions that shape every wrongful-death claim in this state.
Three-Year Statute of Limitations — Measured From Discovery
Oregon's wrongful-death statute, ORS 30.020, creates the cause of action and sets a three-year limitations period under ORS 30.020(1). The clock does not run from the date of death. It runs three years from the date the injury causing the death was discovered, or reasonably should have been discovered, by the decedent, by the personal representative, or by a beneficiary who is not the wrongdoer. Death then sets an outer bar rather than a starting point: the statute says the action may in no case be filed later than the earliest of three years after the death or the longest statute of ultimate repose that applies to the act or omission — including the five-year medical repose in ORS 12.110(4) and the product liability period in ORS 30.905. Two consequences follow that families get wrong in opposite directions. A family who learns of the malpractice long before the death does not get a fresh three years when the death occurs. And a family whose claim arises from a defective product is on the product liability clock in ORS 30.905, not this one — Kambury v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., 334 Or 367 (2002) — which carries its own outer bar ten years after the product was first purchased for use.
Public-Hospital Notice Under the OTCA
When the responsible party is OHSU, a county hospital, or another Oregon public entity, the Oregon Tort Claims Act applies. ORS 30.275(2)(a) gives a wrongful-death claimant one year to give written notice — longer than the 180-day notice that applies to personal-injury claims under the same statute. The year runs from the alleged loss or injury, and the discovery rule applies to it: under Stephens v. Bohlman (1992) the period begins when the claimant has a reasonable opportunity to discover the injury and the identity of the party responsible for it, not automatically on the date of death. The trap: families who hear that wrongful-death claims carry a longer statute of limitations sometimes assume that means more time across the board. It does not. A public-entity wrongful-death claim still requires written notice within the OTCA window, and missing that deadline forfeits the claim against the public defendant even with two years left on the underlying three-year limitations period.
Full OTCA explainer — notice, public bodies, FTCAComparative Negligence
Oregon's modified comparative-fault rule under ORS 31.600 applies in wrongful-death cases. Damages are reduced by the decedent's percentage of fault, and recovery is barred only where that fault is greater than the combined fault of everyone whose fault the jury compares — the defendants, third-party defendants liable in tort, and anyone who has settled. That matters when there is more than one defendant: the comparison is against all of them together, not against the largest one. Fault is not compared with a person who is immune, outside the court's jurisdiction, or already time-barred, unless that person settled with the claimant. Comparative-fault arguments in wrongful-death cases often involve seat-belt use, intoxication, or alleged failure to seek follow-up care. These are jury questions, and they rarely defeat recovery outright. One wrinkle specific to death cases: a beneficiary's own negligence can be raised as a defense to that beneficiary's share — Robinson v. Children's Services Division, 140 Or App 429 (1996).
How comparative fault affects your claimDamages Framework — Wrongful Death vs. Survival
Oregon recognizes two parallel claims when negligence kills. Wrongful-death damages compensate surviving beneficiaries for their losses — loss of the decedent's society, companionship, services, and financial contributions — and are distributed under ORS 30.020. Survival damages compensate the estate for losses the decedent suffered before death, including conscious pain and suffering, pre-death medical expenses, and lost wages between injury and death. Both claims can run in a single action; they are not duplicative because they compensate different losses. Economic damages are uncapped. Punitive damages are available under ORS 31.730 on the same malice/reckless indifference standard that applies to other Oregon tort claims.
Non-economic damages are where the hardest fight usually is. Oregon's statutory cap, ORS 31.710, limits non-economic damages to $500,000, and since a 2021 amendment (SB 193) that cap applies only to wrongful-death claims — the one category of case where it still operates. It does not reach claims governed by the Oregon Tort Claims Act or by the workers' compensation statutes, and it does not cap punitive damages.
The cap is the statutory default in a death case, but it is open to an as-applied constitutional challenge. In Estate of James Ritchie v. Helbig (2026) the Court of Appeals held that the cap does not violate the remedy clause of Article I, section 10, and applied it: the jury's non-economic award was reduced to $500,000, leaving a total remedy of $3,391,588 once the uncapped economic damages were added and the decedent's own 46 percent share of fault was accounted for. In Estate of Grant Raymond Fisher v. Lee (2026) the same court again rejected the argument that the cap can never apply to a wrongful-death claim, but held that cutting a $20 million non-economic award to $500,000 left that family without a constitutionally adequate remedy. That award was entered by a judge on a prima facie showing after the defendant failed to appear, not returned by a jury. The court set no dollar floor and no percentage test; the outcome turns on the severity of the loss and the circumstances of the case. A careful damages analysis at the start of the case identifies whether an as-applied challenge is worth preserving for the family.
Public-Corporation Defendants — OHSU and Federal Health Centers
When a wrongful-death claim involves a state-affiliated provider, the identity of the defendant changes the procedure. Oregon Health & Science University is a public corporation under ORS 353.020 — not a private hospital and not a state agency. The OTCA applies in full: the same one-year wrongful-death notice under ORS 30.275(2)(a), the OTCA damages caps under ORS 30.271 (the state limit, which ORS 30.271(5) applies to OHSU by name — ORS 30.272, the local-body limit, excludes OHSU expressly), and the statutory employee immunity that channels liability to OHSU itself rather than the individual clinician.
Federally Qualified Health Centers present a different problem. When the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has deemed an FQHC and its providers federal employees under the Federally Supported Health Centers Assistance Act, a claim against that clinic is no longer an Oregon tort claim. It is a Federal Tort Claims Act claim against the United States — file an SF-95 administrative claim within two years of death, wait for the agency's denial, and only then sue in federal court. Cases filed against an FQHC-deemed clinic in Oregon state court are routinely removed or dismissed, and the cure is not free: the FTCA window can close while the procedural error is being corrected.
Identifying the right defendant — public corporation, state agency, county hospital, or FQHC — is part of the first-week investigation in any Oregon wrongful-death matter involving a hospital or clinic. Get it wrong and the limitations window can run before the mistake is found.
Oregon deadlines vary by claim type. The table below summarizes the controlling statutes.
| Claim type | Discovery deadline | Statute of repose | Public-hospital notice | Federal FTCA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medical malpractice | 2 yrs (ORS 12.110) | 5 yrs (ORS 12.110(4)) | 180 days (ORS 30.275) | 2 yrs + SF-95 |
| Wrongful death | 3 yrs (ORS 30.020) | — | 1 yr (ORS 30.275(2)(a)) | 2 yrs + SF-95 |
| Personal injury / auto | 2 yrs (ORS 12.110) | — | 180 days (ORS 30.275) | 2 yrs + SF-95 |
Types of Compensation
Economic Damages
Medical bills, lost income, funeral costs
Non-Economic Damages
Pain and suffering, loss of companionship, emotional distress
Punitive Damages
Available under ORS 31.730 when the defendant acted with malice or reckless and outrageous indifference to the rights of others
How We Help
From the initial consultation to the resolution of your case, we guide you through every step of the legal process.
Related Oregon wrongful death law
Three statute-level explainers that recur in Oregon wrongful death cases — public-body notice deadlines, how the recovery is distributed, and the auto coverage that pays after a fatal crash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Related Results
$2,000,000
Wrongful Death
Negligent driving caused death
$1,500,000
Wrongful Death
Negligence caused young man's death
*Past results do not guarantee future outcomes
Related Practice Areas
Medical Malpractice
When medical negligence leads to death, our experience in malpractice litigation strengthens wrongful death claims.
Sepsis & Septic Shock
Deaths from sepsis and septic shock that were not recognized and treated in time — the treatment clocks, the signs of organ failure, and what the record has to show.
Failure to Diagnose Cancer
Deaths following a cancer diagnosis that came too late — stage shift as the injury, and the screening and follow-up failures behind it.
Personal Injury
Comprehensive representation for all types of personal injury cases across Oregon.
Trucking Accidents
Catastrophic trucking collisions frequently result in wrongful death. We hold negligent carriers accountable.
Oregon Tort Claims Act
When the wrongful-death defendant is OHSU, a county hospital, or another public body — the one-year notice and the ORS 30.271 / 30.272 caps explained.
Lost a Loved One? Get a Free Consultation.
Call Todd Huegli today. No fees unless we win your case.
971-317-6436